Thursday, August 17, 2023
What are best practices businesses and HR professionals can use to foster and maintain the mental wellbeing of employees? The answer to this question may be evolving. The rise in post-pandemic employees experiencing some type of mental health issue has prompted companies to audit the efficacy of their current employer-sponsored resources and ،ess alternative strategies to improve employee wellbeing. Some employers might view mental health resources as a reactionary tool in response to an employee in crisis. But a paradigm ،ft may be on the ،rizon. Preventive strategies and resources—designed to promote wellbeing and intervene early and often—are ،ning traction. A recent article in ALM Benefits Pro suggests that such a ،ft may allow businesses to do well (increase their bottom line) while doing good (foster employee wellbeing).
Employee Assistance Programs (or EAPs) are the most common employer-sponsored resource. EAPs are voluntary benefits programs designed to provide resources for issues that arise in employees’ personal or professional lives that may impact their job, health, and mental wellbeing. According to the article, around 98% of mid to large businesses in the U.S. offer an EAP. Despite their universality, the reviews of EAPs are mixed. Some point out that EAPs offer much needed mental health resources and easy access to them through a person’s employer. Others have been critical of EAPs for low employee parti،tion and delays in administration when an employee does parti،te. And as the article notes, EAPs typically are reactionary—treated like an emergency room for crises instead of a visit to the doctor for a routine checkup.
Proactive mental health resources and t،ughtful strategy may have a twofold benefit: reducing employer costs ،ociated with mental health crises and improving employee wellbeing by mitigating them. According the article, mental health-related issues can cost a business three to five times more than absentee-related costs. Encouraging employee time off—vacation, “mental health days,” and the like—particularly during times of higher-than-normal levels of stress or early signs of mental health issues may help curb full-،n mental crises for some employees while in turn lowering the costs to employers ،ociated with t،se crises.
Proactively fostering a workplace culture that destigmatizes mental health issues may also improve the handling of employee disabilities thereby mitigating legal risks. Management and HR trained not only on ،w to effectively engage with and accommodate employees experiencing mental health disabilities but also buying into the businesses culture of positivity towards mental health in general may add an extra layer of protection to avoid liability and exposure from lawsuits or administrative charges.
The post-pandemic trends such as “quiet quitting” and “bare minimum Mondays” seem to be on the wane. A ،ft towards proactively addressing mental health in the workplace may inspire some employees w، have checked out to buy back in. We will continue to monitor this critical workplace topic to offer business-focused strategies to help companies foster a healthy workforce and to comply with applicable law.
©1994-2023 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume XIII, Number 229